There's a superb blog post on Richard Floyd's blog, A Retired Pastor Ruminates, called, The Ministry and its Discontents: pastors in peril.
I've mentioned 'bullying, abusive congregations' on this blog before; Floyd has these in mind, but only partly. What his main concern is that where a church conducts a review of a pastor and doesn't conduct a review of itself, it's heading down a dangerous track. Early in the piece he writes:
...pastors in peril are nothing new, but I  have been noticing a discouraging pattern in my newsletter reading  lately.  And I must interject here that I have known lazy and  incompetent ministers, and others who were just in over their heads, but  that is not what I am talking about here.  Several of my friends who  are smart, wise, bright, hard-working and faithful have suddenly found  themselves in peril.
Typically it starts with some sort of a  parish self-study or pastoral assessment.  That should be harmless  enough, right?  Who can be against transparency and accountability?  But  my heart sinks when I read in the newsletter about the formation of  such a group, because sure enough, when the results come in there are  “concerns” about the pastor, and a special committee is created to  “address the concerns.”  The newsletters typically report such grave  findings in a kind of code, but you don’t have to be a genius to read  between the lines.
Floyd is a man of considerable experience, and he's obviously been through the tough times (as some of his other blog posts have noted). Here he writes in an almost elder statesman style, as one who views the difficulties from the vantage point of acquired wisdom.
This blog post is essential reading.
Floyd is a man of considerable experience, and he's obviously been through the tough times (as some of his other blog posts have noted). Here he writes in an almost elder statesman style, as one who views the difficulties from the vantage point of acquired wisdom.
This blog post is essential reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment